As Taken From a Note on Facebook Monday, Jun 23 2008 

I’m feeling kind of lazy today, so I’ll post a note that I wrote on facebook some time ago. Let’s see what everyone thinks.

“If you don’t have time to read all of this, just skip down to the bottom and pay attention to the important ideas.

Let’s have a little discussion about the not-so-gradual descent of contemporary society into the doldrums of ignorance and complacency. Take, for instance, the high school freshman who walked into the dining hall a few days ago as part of a band camp. Emblazoned on his tee was the phrase “Don’t be too open-minded. It might just fall out.” Ignoring the obvious gap in the understanding about the physical reality of the brain and the “unreality” of the mind, I found this tee to be rather offensive. Not in the sense that I feel I should write to the company that made the shirt, but rather the idea of a parent’s indoctrinating of an impressionable child (loosely used term) to be as closed-minded as possible. Fun, right?

A little later in the same day, on which apparently “inadvertent” bigot camp was eating in the dining hall, I overheard some young, blond girl talking to her friends, and she happened to say by way of an insult, “You’re being such a homo.” Let’s just stop for two seconds and think about this.

Why is it wrong to use “homo” as an insult? Oh, I don’t know. Maybe it implies that one is outside the majority and hence is abnormal. Trying to maintain my head without chucking ice cream into her face, I decided that this is the only possible explanation for her phraseology.

To me, using terms such as “homo” as a desultory term is perhaps more insulting than calling someone “faggot.” Why? Because the word used for homosexuals absent of any negative connotations (i.e. “homo” if you’re not following) being used as an insult marks an instant feeling that the “negative” connotations are not the insult but rather the simple idea of homosexuality itself is the insult.

Why is normalcy so desirable? And I’m not defining the term “normalcy” at all because, and keep your eyes open for this line, sweethearts, THERE IS NO SUCH THING AS A HUMAN CANON! No human is the paragon, the epitome of humanity, and anyone who tries to pass him/herself off as a “normal” person should be socked in the face with bloody loin of pork (the worst punishment I could think of). Perhaps some of you have heard of the idea of “Queer Theory” and the movement regarding the term “queer” as a defamatory term for homosexuality due to its explicit definition as “abnormal” or “deviant.” Let me just say that calling anyone queer for any reason besides sexuality is not done because it is politically incorrect. Why is it acceptable to exclude homosexuality as a safe zone from the label of “queer?” If you think about it, there are multitudes of deviations from the WASP idea of normalcy, so it doesn’t exactly follow that only heteronormative ideas of normalcy should govern how the term “queer” is used. Technically, and follow my line of logic here for how WASP normality is stupid, any difference from this WASP idea is subject to being called queer.

In other words, STOP USING HOMOSEXUALITY AS SOME SORT OF DESULTORY INSULT FOR PEOPLE! There are groups about this, I know, but some people may not be entirely aware of them. If you’re not a member, you should consider joining the facebook group pleaing for people to stop using “gay” and “bad/stupid” as synonyms. I can’t tell you how many times I heard a certain high school English teacher say for her students to “stop being gay” as a substitute for “stop being stupid.”

Consider opening your minds to any ideas and accept people regardless of factors (mentality, sex, gender, race, class, age, education, etc.) that may not necessarily follow your own ideas of normalcy. Consider that other people are discriminated either for different reasons that you are discriminated against or even despite that you are not discriminated against. There are other people on this planet. Be aware of them. Be accepting. Don’t be nasty, heartless, brainless, ignorant sheep who agree with the majority simply because you personally aren’t experiencing problems with the status quo. In short, be a good person. Perhaps it’s a little hokey, but I personally believe that being a genuinely good person is the key to approaching that idea of perfect humanity. So spread the word of goodheartedness, general kindness, and human awareness. Thanks for your time.”

Love,

Adam

Two’s company, three’s a…queerowd? Friday, Jun 20 2008 

Let’s play the hypothetical game for a moment.  Picture, if you will, logging onto a perfectly innocuous gay chat site and talking to a gay man you’ve never met before.  The man, seven years your senior, has a boyfriend of seven years who happens to be eleven years your senior.  The man describes his boyfriend as jealous and anxiety-ridden, worrying about every little thing. Then, the man tells you that his boyfriend has been having fantasies that the man sleeps with someone else.  If it’s okay with the boyfriend, would you be willing to play out this fantasy for the couple?

Though I hadn’t intended to have a lot of issues come from so close to home, this event actually happened to me yesterday.  I have been propositioned to be the “other man” in a real life fantasy.  At first, I completely objected to the idea.  I, also a jealous and anxiety-prone person, would need a commitment in order to have sex.  You know, emotional attachment and whatnot.  Also, I’d feel horrible for breaking up a relationship of seven years when the average longevity of my relationships is 8.5 months (i.e. one relationship that lasted 1.5 years and another that lasted one month).  I would give anything to be in a relationship that lasted that long.

As I thought about it, however, I decided to explore further into the offer.  The guy told me that there would be a commitment between him and me.  It wouldn’t be emotionless sex because, in his words, “emotion makes sex sexy.”

Now, back to the hypothetical game: Assuming that everything this guy tells me is true, is it okay to get involved with him both emotionally and sexually when he already has a boyfriend, and his boyfriend is willing to agree to this arrangement?  Well?  Seems easy, but let’s examine it further.

Monogamy versus sexual liberation.  Is it playing into the heterosexual’s already defined notions of what “true love” is by desiring only ONE romantic partner?  Is it “slutty” to sleep with a guy when he already has a boyfriend?  At one time, sexual liberation was a goal for creating male homosexual visibility.  We existed, so we asserted our existence through sex.  Now that “promiscuous” is the conservative’s synonym for “gay,” is it a hindrance to the gay rights movement to do this peculiar three-way relationship?  Or am I simply queering the idea of relationships in general?  I already know what my answer will be to this guy, but I think it’ll be interesting to see what other people think about it.

Let’s throw another character into the mix, though, and see how it plays out.  Take another guy who messaged me in chat right before Mr. Romantic Threeway.  He said that he “wanted to taste my man milk” (I kid you not).  Would sex with this character, who clearly has no intention of actual romance, make me slutty?  Or am I still thinking according to heterosexual values?  And if “slutdom” applies to the second guy and not the first, or vice versa, then what separates the two?  What do you think?

Love,

Adam

We’ve got a blip on the radar, sir. Thursday, Jun 19 2008 

Gaydar. The ability to detect whether a man is gay or not. I personally have a few friends who claim to have spot-on gaydar. And I’ll admit that, when a certain ambiguous figure with a nice smile enters the room, I go running to them to find out whether or not that guy sets off any alarms. But is this a bad thing?

In my experience, I’ve never been able to look at a guy and just tell if he’s gay. Abercrombie shirt? Well, their quarterlies exude a definite aroma of homoeroticism. But a lot of homophobes also wear Abercrombie. Let’s look at the jeans…tons of holes. That’s pretty chic, but it could just be from a straight game of baseball. Hmm…any pride paraphernalia? You see, for me, “gaydar” is reduced to an analysis of clothing and the style in which it is worn. So…that’s definitely bad.

According to articles in both the New York Times and Psychology Today, gaydar is merely the result of a different chemical response to olfactory stimulus. It’s supposedly based on scent. So I should be able to realize whether or not a guy is gay or not based on his smell, right? Pheromones and all that jazz…yet I don’t think I am capable of that particular hunting-dog method of gay-tracking. Crap.

Instead, let’s look at how my ex from a loooooong time ago claimed to have determined I was gay. He mentioned my gait, my mannerisms, my expressions, and my voice. Just for the record, I typically have some sort of headphones on, and am listening to some pretty cool music, so I’ll jam to the beat a little bit as I walk. My mannerisms…well, they’re just your normal gestures. My voice, I will concede, is a bit higher than perhaps the average hypermasculine Stallone-esque movie star, but not that much higher. So what is it about me that made him raise the gay flag?

Stereotypes. That’s right, boys and girls. Stereotypes of the homosexual male used BY a homosexual male, and one who claimed to be wary of using stereotypes in lieu of good judgment and political correctness. So what do you think? Is it wrong to assume that mannerisms, gait, speech pitch, posture, clothing, etc. are all sexuality markers? Do you use those things as markers? Can you smell a gay man?

Personally, I shamefacedly admit to having used these stereotypes in the past without realizing the self-inflicted damage I was doing to my own idea of how I “should” act. I don’t believe in using those aspects of outward appearance for validation of sexuality. Now it’s time for you to give your opinion, though. I’m certainly not the last word. Does this method of gaydar encourage gay visibility? Does it hinder our ideas of what male homosexuality is? Does this whole gaydar thing even exist? What do you think?

Love,

Adam

Let’s Start This Thing Right. Wednesday, Jun 18 2008 

Enter Adam Carpenter. At twenty years old, he suddenly realizes that all of his creative faculties, sadly under utilized until this point, would be best used in a forum discussing gay awareness-related issues. This is the story of that planet…oh wait, wrong thing.

The Hero of Our Story...for now.

As a gay man, I understand that my homosexuality is not the sole aspect of my personality; however, I cannot divorce my homosexuality from my persona. For that reason, I feel that it is imperative to become more aware of gay issues surrounding me. And when I say gay issues, I mean gay issues. I’m not talking queer, lesbian, trans, bi, etc. issues. Gay. Why? Because it’s what I know. I will NOT, however, be alienating those populations in this blog. Nor will I be ignoring the straight perspective. If you read this blog, homo-, hetero-, pan-, a-, or whatever kind of sexual you may be, leave your insights. Delve into the topic, and you might find yourself delving deeper into…well…yourself. Can we cut the lame inspirational speaker jive and get to some actual issues already? I know that’s what we’re aching to do.

I’d like to open this blog with a discussion of heterosexual privilege. No, this isn’t time to pull out your straight-bashing bats. In fact, it’s never a good time to do that. Just tell me what you feel is one of the most particularly annoying bits of heteronormativity that you’ve ever encountered. Personally, I get really tired of the assumption that every man on the planet is straight until proven otherwise. It’s irritating when you have friends who, when they hear a higher pitch of voice from some musclebound man, instantly make the evaluation that the guy is gay. I’ll admit, I’m not exactly the most butch guy on the planet, but I’m not going to assume that every guy with a deep voice and chest hair is a breeder. Wait…is it politically incorrect to use the term “breeder?” Well, fuck that. I’m reclaiming the word “faggot” for us, the gay men of the universe, whether it be politically correct or not.

Also, coming out stories are always fun, and wouldn’t it be nice to have a gay debut topic for the gay debut of this gay debut? That’s a lot of gay debuts…but it’s a good thing! So bring your opinions, your stories, or just a bit of chit chat aimed this way, and hopefully we’ll have some interesting discussions in the coming months.

Much Love,

Adam

Start posting already!

Hello world! Wednesday, Jun 18 2008 

Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!