This is an exchange I recently had with…let’s call him an acquaintance…and as you can see, we did not see eye to eye.  Keep in mind, this guy is gay, too.  FYI, I’m glover7. He is Swimetc.

glover7:  Yo. What up?
SwimFly2Free:  What are you doing on here?
SwimFly2Free:  you’ve been on here quiet a while now…
glover7:  I’ve been talking to a friend from Atlanta
SwimFly2Free:  i see
SwimFly2Free:  a special friend :)
glover7:  Nah, nah.  I’d never cheat on[boyfriend], lol
SwimFly2Free:  really?
glover7:  Definitely not.  I mean, I kind of love the guy, haha
SwimFly2Free:  really? love? that’s odd… i didn’t think gay men knew what actual love was, i know they love cock, they love sex and they cock and sex at the same time, but no gay man actually knows love
glover7:  Lol,  you need to stop hanging out with the gay guys you hang out with
SwimFly2Free:  why is that?
glover7:  If that’s the values you’re being ingrained with, you’ve been severely misguided.
SwimFly2Free:  i kinda love his cock… it’s the reality of gay life, i have never met somone who doesn’t love cock and doesn’t love the idea of more cock
glover7:  Love whose cock?
SwimFly2Free:  the gay guys i hnag out with
glover7:  Hmm…sounds literally phallocentric.  So odd.
SwimFly2Free:  if you say so…
glover7:  Well, all the gay guys I know are more invested in personality
SwimFly2Free:  put the first thing you see in a guy is not his personality, it’s his face and body and ass… so based on those cirteria you then decide whether or not you want to get to know the person to know if love is an option with that person
glover7:  Don’t you think that sounds kind of shallow?
SwimFly2Free:  no, i think it sounds realistical
SwimFly2Free:  when you met paul, was the first thing you saw his personality or his face?
glover7:  His personality, actually.  I wasn’t attracted to Paul physically when we first met.  But his identity is what grew on me, and that’s what makes him beautiful to me now.
SwimFly2Free:  but would you sleep with him if he was fat and ugly
SwimFly2Free:  but had the same personality?
glover7:  To be perfectly honest, yes.
SwimFly2Free:  i highly doubt that
glover7:  But then “fat” and “ugly” are such subjective terms in our culture that it’s really not fair to make that assessment.
SwimFly2Free:  sure it is, no human is going to have sex with someone they are not physically attractedd to.
glover7:  No, because what society defines as “fat” is not necessarily the definition that I use.  And I’m fairly inclusive with my taste of guys in terms of physical attraction.
glover7:  In fact, I find few things less attractive than someone who’s just plain stupid.  It’s based almost entirely on personality.
SwimFly2Free:  i agree that stupidity is an unattractive quality, but in the end you are still having sex with someone you think is attractive
SwimFly2Free:  thus basiing all sexual relationships on the factor that you must find the person you are fucking sexually attractive
glover7:  But you’re equating sexual attractiveness solely with physical appearance. That’s not necessarily the case in every instance of coitus.
SwimFly2Free:  but it is in every situation.  Do you think Paul is ugly?
glover7:  I don’t think he’s ugly, no.  That doesn’t mean I haven’t slept with guys I found to be physically unattractive but intellectually beautiful.
glover7:  Just because I have one boyfriend who happens to be conventionally good-looking doesn’t mean I haven’t had others who aren’t.
SwimFly2Free:  but you were attractedd to them and thought they were attractive
glover7:  Not physically though.
glover7:  My first boyfriend was kind of repulsive, physically, if you want the truth.  What I was attracted to was his personality.  What I’m telling you is that you can’t reduce every gay guy’s mentality to the same as the gay guys’ mentalities that you know.
SwimFly2Free:  in the end it can all relate to two thing in life…
SwimFly2Free:  1. Everyone lies
SwimFly2Free:  2. Everything revolves around sex and the idea of having sex. we are animals and the purpose of animals is to reproduce, so we keep fucking
glover7:  I completely disagree.  You’ve just reduced every form of civilization to pure behaviorism, and that’s thoroughly incorrect.
SwimFly2Free:  how would a civilization thrive without reproduction?
SwimFly2Free:  and lying?
glover7:  No, I’m not arguing against the merits of reproduction.  I’m just saying that you can’t make a reductive statement like that and defend it at all.  If all society existed to do was to reproduce and lie, then society wouldn’t exist as it does today.
SwimFly2Free:  the average man goes 4 minutes before thinking of something else revolving around sex…
glover7:  That doesn’t mean that society revolves singularly around sex
SwimFly2Free:  you’re telling me that society doesn’t base it’self around sex?
glover7:  I will concede that modern society is heavily influenced by sexuality, but I will never admit that sex (and lying) has been the only impetus behind the success of civilization.
SwimFly2Free:  we wouldn’t have society if we didn’t have sex, and by the way the average person lies 7 times an hour (that’s if you include all the times you lie to yourself in a day)
SwimFly2Free:  did you know that 100% of couples surveyed ina well know acreditted study all lied to each by the end of their 3rd date?
glover7:  You misread my statements.  As I said, I do not discount that sex is a necessity, but it’s not the only thing that has brought civilization about.
glover7:  And just because lying is common doesn’t mean that it’s the only other option in determining the creation of civilization.
SwimFly2Free:  impressing people with your brain and the need to impress others so you can sleep with someone is also what brought about society and continues to build society
glover7:  No.  Self-driven intellect is almost always the venerated quality.  You can look at ancient Rome and see that they value logic over sex and passion any day.  You’re equating human beings with animals, and that’s not right.
glover7:  In fact, sex and intelligence are almost constantly seen as being at odds with each other.
SwimFly2Free:  then what are humans? are we robots? we are animals… But ancient rome also said it was perfectly ok for men to go to bathhouses and have sex with other men
SwimFly2Free:  i am going to go watch tv now and eat. see ya later.
glover7:  1.  Robots and animals are diametric opposites.  You’re using a fallacy of comparison in addressing my statement.  Humans are animals, by the purely scientific definition.  In a more dynamic sense, we are far beyond animals.  Just look at what we’ve achieved.  And
glover7:  Have a good time.
SwimFly2Free:  we come from animals, evolution proves we are animals and that we are just as much a part of the animal kingdom as any other animal, we simply have a higher brain. We still base everthing around sex. sex is what drives the human race, no sex, no human race. PS, on average a person gets liedd to 200 times a day! See ya!

As you can see, I didn’t get to complete my last thought before my Southern hospitality reaction kicked in, and I had to be polite while he basically just shut out anything I said.  What do you think is wrong with this picture?